Mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 90:4

אמר ליה רב הונא בריה דרב נתן לרב פפא אלא מעתה (ויקרא כב, ב) אשר הם מקדישים ה"נ הם ולא עובדי כוכבים

We have thus found [it of] defilement. How do we know [it of] nothar? Identity of law with defilement is learnt from the fact that 'profanation' is written in both. Yet let us learn identity of law from piggul, because 'iniquity' is written in connection with both? - Reason asserts that we should learn it from uncleanness, because [they are alike in respect of] Gezel, [this being a] mnemonic. On the contrary, one should learn it from piggul, because [it resembles it in the following points:] permissibility, the headplate, cleanness, time, that which is offered; and these are more numerous? - Rather, it [is derived] from Levi's teaching. For Levi taught: How do we know that the Writ speaks of time disqualification too? Because it says, That they profane not [My holy name]:

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 90:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.